Comic








Others






Skepticism







Permalink

 

 

2013-02-06

I try to keep the content in this comic appropriate for younger people because I want it to be accessible for everyone—no easy task considering I’m illustrating one the most perverse and violent books in history! I don’t like censorship, but I do like to expand my reach, so it is often necessary to curb my expletives. However, sometimes I can’t hold back and expletives are demanded by these pathetic euphemisms.

If you’re a biblical literalist, Leviticus 15:24 is certainly talking about a woman putting flowers on your penis, which I’m totally down for. However, for those of us who understand concepts like metaphor, we’re talking about, and say it with me everyone it’s not that hard, menses.

In actuality, I don’t think is this is a reference to a blossom, so much as an archaic homograph. A thing which flows is a “flow-er,” and multiple flowing things together are “flow-ers,” thus “flowers.” Get it? Not 100% sure about this, but I can’t find any reputable evidence online. Anyway, the Biblical Hebrew word used is niddah, a word choice of which the original authors should be ashamed. This word doesn’t mean “flow,” but rather something more along the lines of “personal impurity.” The same word that is used to talk about a woman’s menstruation is also used to refer to non-potable water and land occupied by sinful people. The authors aren’t implying that a woman’s menstruation is filthy, they’re outright saying that it’s dangerous!

Modern translations acknowledge such a definition by translating the word to “menstrual impurity.” Of course, unless you have an infection, menses is not impure. Modern Christians easily dodge this issue by claiming that words like “unclean” and “impure” don’t mean what the bible says they mean… unless they’re referring to sin, in which case, they do! I find it amazing how nobody thought of this until after germ theory was discovered. For example, around 1800 CE, biblical commentator Adam Clarke wrote that children who are conceived when a woman is menstruating tend to be “infected with leprous, scrofulous, and other deeply radicated diseases.” Turns out, he wasn’t exactly correct on that assumption.

According to the bible, when a man does accidentally get his wife’s menses on his penis, he and his bed is unclean for a week (almost as if he was menstruating himself). Note that I say “accidentally” because no man would ever knowingly have sex with a menstruating woman, right? Well, just wait until we reach Leviticus 20:18 and you’ll see why!

 

Comments

Maju writes:

 

Sincerely I don't know what bloodthirsty Yaveh has against women's blood. It's just more morcillas (look it up in Wipipedia if you don't know what that is).

Ah, but of course Hebrews (and some Christians, I guess, and Muslims too) probably hate morcillas (which can well be delicious IMO) because they are made of pig's blood. More for me!

On another issue, what happened to all the action?! Leviticus could bore even Ned Flanders himself!

TheAlmightyGuru writes:

 

I hear you Maju. This is a real snore-fest.

As for morcillas, I've always heard it referred to as black pudding, but you're right, it's yummy!

Maju writes:

 

Yeah, morcilla is the Spanish name for a blood and leak (Basque style, softer) or blood and rice and some other spice (Castilian style, rougher) sausage. I was not sure how familiar Anglosaxons are with this kind of food, although I know it exists somewhere in Britain (Scotland??), also I though the name was "blood pudding" not "black pudding" - my name sounds even more vampiric, so to say. :D

TheAlmightyGuru writes:

 

Heh heh, some places call it for what it is, "blood sausage," but I think the name freaks out too many people, so they euphemise it. It's funny that you bring this up because I'm using it as the topic of a future comic I'm working on!

 

Oh the irony!