Difference between revisions of "The Story of Mathematics"

From TheAlmightyGuru
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Good
 
Good
 
* The book is fully illustrated.
 
* The book is fully illustrated.
* The book starts with pre-number systems like tick marks, and talks about various early counting systems like Roman Numerals and base-5, 12 and 60 systems, and the Chinese multiplicative system, before finally getting to the Hindu-Qrabic system. This is a great introduction to teaching how numbers are a something humans had to invent rather than be actual things. It also talks about early versions of zero before finally getting the true placeholder, and negative numbers.  
+
* The book starts with pre-number systems like tick marks, and talks about various early counting systems like Roman Numerals and base-5, 12 and 60 systems, and the Chinese multiplicative system, before finally getting to the Hindu-Qrabic system. This is a great introduction to teaching how numbers are a something humans had to invent rather than be actual things. It also talks about early versions of zero before finally getting the true placeholder, and negative numbers, and fractions.
 +
* I like how it discusses how early cultures don't have words for big numbers, and, when they do, they're cumbersome.  
  
 
Bad
 
Bad
 
* The magazine layout with lots of sidebars makes it very difficult to read.
 
* The magazine layout with lots of sidebars makes it very difficult to read.

Revision as of 12:07, 17 March 2023

The Story of Mathematics is a book about the history of mathematics written by Anne Rooney and published on.

Personal

I own a paperback. O read it shortly after buying it. Then, wanting to reread it.

Review

Good

  • The book is fully illustrated.
  • The book starts with pre-number systems like tick marks, and talks about various early counting systems like Roman Numerals and base-5, 12 and 60 systems, and the Chinese multiplicative system, before finally getting to the Hindu-Qrabic system. This is a great introduction to teaching how numbers are a something humans had to invent rather than be actual things. It also talks about early versions of zero before finally getting the true placeholder, and negative numbers, and fractions.
  • I like how it discusses how early cultures don't have words for big numbers, and, when they do, they're cumbersome.

Bad

  • The magazine layout with lots of sidebars makes it very difficult to read.