Difference between revisions of "Quicksilver"

From TheAlmightyGuru
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 23: Line 23:
  
  
[[Category: Book]]
+
[[Category: Books]]
 
[[Category: Fiction]]
 
[[Category: Fiction]]
 
[[Category: Speculative Fiction]]
 
[[Category: Speculative Fiction]]

Revision as of 13:44, 15 March 2017

File:Quicksilver.jpg
First edition cover.

Quicksilver is historic fiction, and the first three volumes of the Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson. The book follows three fiction characters as they interact with a most otherwise historical England during the days of Isaac Newton, Gottfried Leibniz, Robert Hooke, and various other members of the Royal Society.

I originally started reading this book shortly after it was published, but never finished the first book. A few years later, I re-started it, and made it over halfway through, but still gave up. In 2016, I found an audio book version of it, and finished it in a few weeks. It's a daunting read, but extremely worth it.

Review

Good

  • For the vast majority of the book, I enjoyed the story and characters which is quite a feat considering how long the book is.
  • The attention to detail on the various cultures of the time and the vast array of historical figures is astounding.
  • I liked the inclusion of the ancestors of the Cryptonomicon. The Shaftoes, Waterhouses, and Roots had impressive lineages.
  • The character Enoch Root, who seems to have discovered the philosophical mercury, is quite interesting.

Bad

  • While I thoroughly enjoyed the characters Jack and Eliza, I kept wishing they would have more interactions with the members of the Royal Society, as I wanted to know more about the scientific discoveries.
  • There seemed to be a bit of padding, parts of the story that were unimportant to the plot, but even they weren't very tedious.

Ugly

  • Nothing, this book is amazing.

Links