Jesus cursing the fig tree
Jesus Cursing the Fig Tree is Christian a story found in the Gospel of Mark. The author of the Gospel of Matthew copied the story, but altered it to make it more impressive, and it may have been the basis for a similar story in the Gospel of Luke. Like most of the stories in Christian writings, the tale has no verifiable evidence, doesn't have a clear purpose, and can very easily be viewed as immoral.
Gospel of Mark
To put this tale in context, Jesus and his apostles enter Jerusalem, then:
- The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. Then he said to the tree, "May no one ever eat fruit from you again." And his disciples heard him say it. (Mark 11:12-14 NIV)
Next, Jesus drives the money changers out of the temple and leaves the city to an unspecified location. Then:
- In the morning, as they went along, they saw the fig tree withered from the roots. Peter remembered and said to Jesus, "Rabbi, look! The fig tree you cursed has withered!" "Have faith in God," Jesus answered. "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it
will be yours. And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive him, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins. (Mark 11:20-26 NIV)
Finally, Jesus re-enters Jerusalem where his authority is questioned.
Like most of Mark, this story is pretty jumbled having no continuity with the stories around it. The story itself is clear, if you have faith in God, you can perform miracles, but, of course, this has been prove untrue countless times. For every Christian who claims they cured their sore knee through the power of prayer, countless children die of illness despite their truly devote parents praying for a miracle. I also have a problem with the fact the Jesus killed a tree for not bearing fruit out of season. Why kill an innocent tree when he could have moved a mountain, which would have been far more impressive?
Gospel of Matthew
Matthew's timeline is a bit different. First, Jesus enters Jerusalem, drives out the money changers, heals the sick, is identified as the son of David, and leaves to Bethany. Then:
- Early in the morning, as he was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, "May you never bear fruit again!" Immediately the tree withered. When the disciples saw this, they were amazed. "How did the fig tree wither so quickly?" they asked. Jesus replied, "I tell you the truth, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and it will be done. If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer." (Matthew 21:18-22 NIV)
Finally, Jesus returns to the temple courts where his authority is questioned.
Matthew's author wasn't impressed by a 24-hour miracle and changed the story so the withering occurs before the eyes of the disciples. Perhaps he was addressing criticism that the tree could have died of natural causes over night?
Gospel of Luke
If this story were found in Luke, it should be placed just before chapter 20, but it is not there. Instead, Luke contains a parable, not found in Mark or Matthew, which may be a heavily modified version of the original, about a fig tree that doesn't bear fruit. In Luke, Jesus says that just because terrible things happen to people, it doesn't mean they were vile sinners, and that all must repent or perish. Then:
- Then he told this parable: "A man had a fig tree, planted in his vineyard, and he went to look for fruit on it, but did not find any. So he said to the man who took care of the vineyard, 'For three years now I've been coming to look for fruit on this fig tree and haven't found any. Cut it down! Why should it use up the soil?' "'Sir,' the man replied, 'leave it alone for one more year, and I'll dig around it and fertilize it. If it bears fruit next year, fine! If not, then cut it down.'" (Luke 13:6-9)
To me, it seems pretty clear that this story is about giving people second chances, while the story of Jesus cursing the fig tree is clearly not. Because of this, I'm more inclined to think that the author of Luke simply didn't like the story from Mark because it doesn't make sense, and excised it. Whether this parable was a way to try and give a more positive take on the story, or is related only cosmetically, I'm not sure.
Gospel of John
No remotely similar story is found in John, which is to be expected since it doesn't share the sources of Mark or Q.
I'm not familiar with any specific In general, Christians agree that this is a miracle,
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cursing_the_fig_tree - Wikipedia.
- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_barren_fig_tree - Wikipedia.