Difference between revisions of "Humanity reboot"

From TheAlmightyGuru
Jump to: navigation, search
m (TheAlmightyGuru moved page World reboot to Humanity reboot without leaving a redirect)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:World Reboot.svg|thumb|256x256px|Restarting history should yield similar scientific results, but not similar religious results.]]
+
[[Image:Humanity Reboot.svg|thumb|256x256px|Restarting history should result in similar scientific results, but not similar cultural results.]]
  
'''World reboot''' is a [[thought experiments|thought experiment]] which attempts to demonstrate a fundamental difference between evidence-based beliefs, and other forms of belief.
+
'''Humanity reboot''' is a [[thought experiments|thought experiment]] which attempts to demonstrate a fundamental difference between evidence-based beliefs, and other forms of belief.
  
Imagine rebooting the world as though it were a computer. We reset everything back to the dawn of humanity, before any technology, before any religions, before any culture, and then we let history replay itself.
+
Imagine rebooting humanity as though it were a computer, all the way back to the very dawn of ''Homo sapiens'', before any technology or culture, and then we let history play itself out again.
  
Without any intervention, it's reasonable to believe that humans will once again make stone tools, tame fire, create the wheel, being writing, discover mathematics and logic, invent microscopes and telescopes, and once again understand relativity and quantum mechanics. Science and technology will progress and develop more or less the same as it is now, because science and technology are based on the objective fundamental laws of the universe.
+
It's reasonable to believe that humans will once again make stone tools, tame fire, create the wheel, begin writing, discover mathematics and logic, invent microscopes and telescopes, and eventually understand relativity and quantum mechanics. Achievements of science and technology will progress and develop more or less the same as it is now, because science and technology are based on the objective fundamental laws of the universe.
  
However, the same can not be said for religion. People might once again go through a stage where they will believe lightning bolts are hurled to the ground by a god in the sky, but they won't name their god Zeus, they won't think he lives on a specific mountain in Greece, or believe he sometimes descends in the form of a swan to impregnate young maidens. There will most likely be a belief that a wonderful afterlife can be obtained by following a specific religion, but it probably won't be a specific Middle Eastern man who was executed to appease a vengeful god who is also the slain man's father, and both of them hate gay sex. Religions are not based on laws of the universe, but are cultural constructs, and, barring supernatural intervention, they will won't repeat.
+
However, the same can not be said for specific cultural achievements. Although humans will will no doubt create painting, music, and drama once again, they certainly won't recreate the ''[[Starry Night]]'', ''[[Bohemian Rhapsody]]'', or ''[[Hamlet]]''. The same is true for religion. People might go through a stage where they will believe lightning bolts are hurled to the ground by a god in the sky, but they won't name their god Zeus, or think he lives on a specific mountain in Greece, or believe he sometimes descends in the form of a swan to impregnate young maidens. No doubt new religions will claim that wonderful afterlife can be obtained, but, barring supernatural intervention, they won't be contingent on a specific Middle Eastern man who was executed to appease a vengeful god who is also the slain man's father, and both of them hate gay sex.
  
However, there are some forms of world views that probably will repeat. For example, throughout history, many people have independently come to the conclusion that we should behave as though the natural world is all there is, and that this life is our own, so we should try to make things better for everyone in the here and now, a belief known as [[secular humanism]]. Compare this to the conclusion that following the tenets of the Southern Baptist Convention is the proper way to view the world are the people who created the Southern Baptist Convention and the people who they indoctrinate. Nobody has ever independently constructed a belief system that was very similar to the Southern Baptist Convention.  
+
However, there are some cultural world views that are generic enough that they probably will repeat. For example, throughout history, many people have independently come to the conclusion that we should behave as though the natural world is all there is, and that life is precious, so we should try to make things better for everyone in the here and now, a belief known as [[secular humanism]]. In contrast, only one group has ever independently concluded that the tenants of the Southern Baptist Convention is the best way to live life, other than the people who created the Southern Baptist Convention and those they indoctrinate.  
  
  

Revision as of 16:34, 19 November 2018

Restarting history should result in similar scientific results, but not similar cultural results.

Humanity reboot is a thought experiment which attempts to demonstrate a fundamental difference between evidence-based beliefs, and other forms of belief.

Imagine rebooting humanity as though it were a computer, all the way back to the very dawn of Homo sapiens, before any technology or culture, and then we let history play itself out again.

It's reasonable to believe that humans will once again make stone tools, tame fire, create the wheel, begin writing, discover mathematics and logic, invent microscopes and telescopes, and eventually understand relativity and quantum mechanics. Achievements of science and technology will progress and develop more or less the same as it is now, because science and technology are based on the objective fundamental laws of the universe.

However, the same can not be said for specific cultural achievements. Although humans will will no doubt create painting, music, and drama once again, they certainly won't recreate the Starry Night, Bohemian Rhapsody, or Hamlet. The same is true for religion. People might go through a stage where they will believe lightning bolts are hurled to the ground by a god in the sky, but they won't name their god Zeus, or think he lives on a specific mountain in Greece, or believe he sometimes descends in the form of a swan to impregnate young maidens. No doubt new religions will claim that wonderful afterlife can be obtained, but, barring supernatural intervention, they won't be contingent on a specific Middle Eastern man who was executed to appease a vengeful god who is also the slain man's father, and both of them hate gay sex.

However, there are some cultural world views that are generic enough that they probably will repeat. For example, throughout history, many people have independently come to the conclusion that we should behave as though the natural world is all there is, and that life is precious, so we should try to make things better for everyone in the here and now, a belief known as secular humanism. In contrast, only one group has ever independently concluded that the tenants of the Southern Baptist Convention is the best way to live life, other than the people who created the Southern Baptist Convention and those they indoctrinate.