A Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America
| A Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America | ||||||||||||
|
Paperback - USA - 1st edition. |
||||||||||||
|
A Field Guide to the Wildlife of North America is a field guide of North American wildlife with a brief description and large full-color photograph of over 170 animals. It was written by Bryan Richard and published in 2006.
Personal
| Own? | Flexibound, USA. |
|---|---|
| Read? | Flexibound, USA. |
| Finished | 2017-11-07. |
I bought the flexibound version of this book, not just because it was on clearance and quite cheap, but also because of the beautiful photographs of each animal. I had leafed though it for years, but finally read it through cover-to-cover in 2017.
Review
|
Overall: |
|
Good
- Over all, the book is pretty great. It's a good read and fun just to flip through.
- The large photos of each animal are very useful and much better than a long description found in many less-visual guides.
- The descriptions are full of interesting trivia for each animal.
- The side notes include size and ways to distinguish the animal from similar looking species.
- The binomial nomenclature is included for each animal.
Bad
- The descriptions seem to only focus on the more interesting facts and are far from exhaustive. Sometimes they describe how the animal winters, sometimes not; sometimes they talk about reproduction, sometimes not. No doubt, it's a matter of space constraints, but I would gladly accept a smaller type size for more information.
- With fewer than 180 animals and a range of the entire continent, it's not very useful for even an average hiker or explorer. Instead, it works more as a home reference book. It would have been nice to see a book for each region or state.
Ugly
- Nothing.
Covers
The original cover focuses on three animal types, mammals, invertebrates, and birds. It's a bit dull for my taste, especially with the canary colored backdrop.
The flexibound spotlights the fox, but also has three foreground photos, all mammals. It doesn't do as good a job showing the span of the animals in the book, but it looks more professional.
Links
